AMD Epyc 7301 vs AMD FX-6300

VS
AMD Epyc 7301
AMD Epyc 7301 Image
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-6300 Image
AMD Epyc 7301
AMD FX-6300
Key Differences Key Differences AMD Epyc 7301 AMD FX-6300
Cores 16 6
CPU Threads 32 6
Base Clock Speed 2.2GHz 3.5GHz
Turbo Clock Speed 2.7GHz 4.1GHz
TDP (THERMAL DESIGN POINT) 155W 95W
Has integrated graphics No No
Performance per watt Not Known 80.0
Performance Performance AMD Epyc 7301 AMD FX-6300
CPU Speed & Cores 16 x 2.2GHz 6 x 3.5GHz
Number of CPU Threads 32 6
L2 Cache Size 8MB 6MB
L3 Cache Size 64MB 8MB
Turbo Boost Frequency 2.7GHz 4.1GHz
L1 Cache Size 1536KB 288KB
L2 Core 0.5MB/core 1MB/core
L3 Core 4MB/core 1.33MB/core
Does it have an unlocked multiplier No Yes
Uses ARM big.LITTLE tech No No
Uses ARM HMP No No
Turbo Core Tech Version Not Known 3
Features Features AMD Epyc 7301 AMD FX-6300
Has AES Support Yes Yes
Supported SSE Version 4.2 4.2
Has AVX Support Yes Yes
Has MMX Tech Support Yes Yes
Has F16C Support Yes Yes
Has NX Processor Bit Support Yes Yes
Has FMA3 Instructions Support Yes Yes
Supports CPU Throttling No Yes
Supports ARM TrustZone Tech No No
Has FMA4 Instructions Support No Yes
Has Multithreading Tech Support No No
General info General info AMD Epyc 7301 AMD FX-6300
Has 64-bit Support No Data Found No Data Found
Semiconductor Size 14nm 32nm
TDP (Thermal Design Point) 155W 95W
PCI Express Version 3 2
Transistor Count 19200 million 1200 million
Does it have Integrated Graphics No No
Supports Power Optimized L2 Cache No No
Memory Memory AMD Epyc 7301 AMD FX-6300
RAM Memory Speed 2400MHz 1866MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 307GB/s 21GB/s
Max Memory Channels 8 2
Supported Memory Size 2000GB Not Known
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support Yes No
Bus Bandwidth Not Known 5.4GT/s
Benchmarks Benchmarks AMD Epyc 7301 AMD FX-6300
PassMark Score Not Known 6445
PassMark Score (Single Thread) Not Known 1430
PassMark Score (Overclocked) Not Known 7536
CPU Performance (Per Watt) Not Known 80.0
Power Consumption Under High Load Not Known 145.7W
Standard Power Consumption Not Known 72.2W

Similar Comparisons