AMD Epyc 7402 vs Intel Xeon D-1559

VS
AMD Epyc 7402
AMD Epyc 7402 Image
Intel Xeon D-1559
Intel Xeon D-1559 Image
AMD Epyc 7402
Intel Xeon D-1559
Key Differences Key Differences AMD Epyc 7402 Intel Xeon D-1559
Cores 24 12
CPU Threads 48 24
Base Clock Speed 2.8GHz 1.5GHz
Turbo Clock Speed 3.35GHz 2.1GHz
TDP (THERMAL DESIGN POINT) 180W 45W
Has integrated graphics No No
Performance per watt Not Known Not Known
Performance Performance AMD Epyc 7402 Intel Xeon D-1559
CPU Speed & Cores 24 x 2.8GHz 12 x 1.5GHz
Number of CPU Threads 48 24
L2 Cache Size 12MB 3MB
L3 Cache Size 128MB 18MB
Turbo Boost Frequency 3.35GHz 2.1GHz
L1 Cache Size 1536KB 768KB
L2 Core 0.5MB/core 0.25MB/core
L3 Core 5.33MB/core 1.5MB/core
Does it have an unlocked multiplier No No
Uses ARM big.LITTLE tech No No
Uses ARM HMP No No
Clock Multiplier Not Known 15
Turbo Boost Tech Version Not Known 2
Features Features AMD Epyc 7402 Intel Xeon D-1559
Has AES Support Yes Yes
Supported SSE Version 4.2 4.2
Has AVX Support Yes Yes
Has MMX Tech Support Yes Yes
Has F16C Support Yes Yes
Has FMA4 Instructions Support No No
Has Multithreading Tech Support Yes Yes
Has NX Processor Bit Support Yes Yes
Has FMA3 Instructions Support Yes Yes
Supports CPU Throttling No Yes
Supports ARM TrustZone Tech No No
General info General info AMD Epyc 7402 Intel Xeon D-1559
Has 64-bit Support No Data Found No Data Found
Semiconductor Size 14nm 14nm
TDP (Thermal Design Point) 180W 45W
PCI Express Version 4 3
Does it have Integrated Graphics No No
CPU Temperature Not Known 85°C
3DMark06 Score Not Known No Data Found
Supports Power Optimized L2 Cache No No Data Found
Memory Memory AMD Epyc 7402 Intel Xeon D-1559
RAM Memory Speed 3200MHz 2133MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 204.8GB/s Not Known
Max Memory Channels 8 2
Supported Memory Size 4000GB 128GB
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support Yes Yes
DDR Type Memory Version 4 Not Known
Benchmarks Benchmarks AMD Epyc 7402 Intel Xeon D-1559
Power Consumption Under High Load Not Known No Data Found
Standard Power Consumption Not Known No Data Found

Similar Comparisons