AMD Epyc 7702P vs AMD A6-9500

VS
AMD Epyc 7702P
AMD Epyc 7702P Image
AMD A6-9500
AMD A6-9500 Image
AMD Epyc 7702P
AMD A6-9500
Key Differences Key Differences AMD Epyc 7702P AMD A6-9500
Cores 64 2
CPU Threads 128 2
Base Clock Speed 2GHz 3.5GHz
Turbo Clock Speed 3.35GHz 3.8GHz
TDP (THERMAL DESIGN POINT) 200W 65W
Has integrated graphics No Yes
Performance per watt 57.2 Not Known
Performance Performance AMD Epyc 7702P AMD A6-9500
CPU Speed & Cores 64 x 2GHz 2 x 3.5GHz
Number of CPU Threads 128 2
L2 Cache Size 32MB 1MB
L3 Cache Size 256MB Not Known
Turbo Boost Frequency 3.35GHz 3.8GHz
L1 Cache Size 4096KB 160KB
L2 Core 0.5MB/core 0.5MB/core
L3 Core 4MB/core Not Known
Does it have an unlocked multiplier No Yes
Uses ARM big.LITTLE tech No No
Uses ARM HMP No No
Features Features AMD Epyc 7702P AMD A6-9500
Has AES Support Yes Yes
Supported SSE Version 4.2 4.2
Has AVX Support Yes Yes
Has MMX Tech Support Yes Yes
Has F16C Support Yes Yes
Has FMA4 Instructions Support No Yes
Has Multithreading Tech Support Yes No
Has NX Processor Bit Support Yes Yes
Has FMA3 Instructions Support Yes Yes
Supports CPU Throttling No No
Supports ARM TrustZone Tech No No
General info General info AMD Epyc 7702P AMD A6-9500
Has 64-bit Support No Data Found No Data Found
Semiconductor Size 14nm 28nm
TDP (Thermal Design Point) 200W 65W
PCI Express Version 4 3
Does it have Integrated Graphics No Yes
GPU Base Clock Speed Not Known 1029MHz
Supports Power Optimized L2 Cache No No
Memory Memory AMD Epyc 7702P AMD A6-9500
RAM Memory Speed 3200MHz 2400MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 190.7GB/s 38.4GB/s
Max Memory Channels 8 2
Supported Memory Size 4000GB Not Known
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support Yes No
DDR Type Memory Version 4 Not Known
Benchmarks Benchmarks AMD Epyc 7702P AMD A6-9500
PassMark Score 68213 3187
PassMark Score (Single Thread) 2210 1786
Geekbench 5 Score (Multi-Thread) 11436 Not Known
Cinebench R20 Score (Single Thread) 391 Not Known
Cinebench R20 Score (Multi-Thread) 18857 Not Known
Geekbench 5 Score (Single Thread) 779 Not Known
CPU Performance (Per Watt) 57.2 Not Known

Similar Comparisons