AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 vs Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4

VS
AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900
AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 Image
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 Image
AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
Key Differences Key Differences AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
Cores 12 4
CPU Threads 24 8
Base Clock Speed 3.1GHz 3.7GHz
Turbo Clock Speed 4.3GHz 4GHz
TDP (THERMAL DESIGN POINT) 65W 140W
Has integrated graphics No No
Performance per watt Not Known 86.1
Performance Performance AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
CPU Speed & Cores 12 x 3.1GHz 4 x 3.7GHz
Number of CPU Threads 24 8
L2 Cache Size 6MB 1MB
L3 Cache Size 64MB 10MB
Turbo Boost Frequency 4.3GHz 4GHz
L1 Cache Size 768KB 128KB
L2 Core 0.5MB/core 0.2MB/core
Does it have an unlocked multiplier No No
L3 Core 5.33MB/core 2.5MB/core
Uses ARM big.LITTLE tech No No
Uses ARM HMP No No
Clock Multiplier Not Known 37
Features Features AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
Has AES Support Yes Yes
Supported SSE Version 4.2 4.2
Has AVX Support Yes Yes
Has MMX Tech Support Yes Yes
Has F16C Support Yes No
Has FMA4 Instructions Support No No
Has Multithreading Tech Support Yes Yes
Has NX Processor Bit Support Yes Yes
Has FMA3 Instructions Support Yes No
Supports CPU Throttling No Yes
Supports ARM TrustZone Tech No No
General info General info AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
Has 64-bit Support No Data Found No Data Found
Semiconductor Size 7nm 14nm
TDP (Thermal Design Point) 65W 140W
PCI Express Version 4 3
CPU Temperature 95°C 69°C
Does it have Integrated Graphics No No
Supports Power Optimized L2 Cache No No
Memory Memory AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
RAM Memory Speed 3200MHz 2400MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 47.68GB/s 76.8GB/s
Max Memory Channels 2 4
Supported Memory Size 128GB 1536GB
DDR Type Memory Version 4 Not Known
Bus Bandwidth Not Known 5GT/s
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support No Yes
Benchmarks Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 3900 Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
PassMark Score 31800 Not Known
PassMark Score (Single Thread) 2637 Not Known
CPU Performance (Per Watt) Not Known 86.1

Similar Comparisons