Intel Xeon Phi 7290 vs Intel Xeon E5-2603

VS
Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Intel Xeon Phi 7290 Image
Intel Xeon E5-2603
Intel Xeon E5-2603 Image
Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Intel Xeon E5-2603
Key Differences Key Differences Intel Xeon Phi 7290 Intel Xeon E5-2603
Cores 72 4
CPU Threads 72 4
Base Clock Speed 1.5GHz 1.8GHz
Turbo Clock Speed 1.7GHz Not Known
TDP (THERMAL DESIGN POINT) 245W 80W
Has integrated graphics No No
Performance per watt Not Known Not Known
Performance Performance Intel Xeon Phi 7290 Intel Xeon E5-2603
CPU Speed & Cores 72 x 1.5GHz 4 x 1.8GHz
Number of CPU Threads 72 4
L2 Cache Size 36MB 1MB
Turbo Boost Frequency 1.7GHz Not Known
L1 Cache Size 4608KB 256KB
L2 Core 0.5MB/core 0.25MB/core
Turbo Boost Tech Version 2 Not Known
L3 Cache Size Not Known 10MB
Does it have an unlocked multiplier No No
L3 Core Not Known 2.5MB/core
Uses ARM big.LITTLE tech No No
Uses ARM HMP No No
Clock Multiplier Not Known 18
Features Features Intel Xeon Phi 7290 Intel Xeon E5-2603
Has AES Support Yes Yes
Has AVX Support Yes Yes
Has Multithreading Tech Support Yes No
Has NX Processor Bit Support Yes Yes
Supports CPU Throttling No Yes
Supported SSE Version Not Known 4.2
Has MMX Tech Support No Yes
Has F16C Support No No
Supports ARM TrustZone Tech No No
Has FMA4 Instructions Support No No
Has FMA3 Instructions Support No No
General info General info Intel Xeon Phi 7290 Intel Xeon E5-2603
Has 64-bit Support No Data Found No Data Found
Semiconductor Size 14nm 32nm
TDP (Thermal Design Point) 245W 80W
PCI Express Version 3 3
Transistor Count 8000 million 2270 million
Does it have Integrated Graphics No No
Supports Power Optimized L2 Cache No No
Memory Memory Intel Xeon Phi 7290 Intel Xeon E5-2603
RAM Memory Speed 2400MHz 1066MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 115.2GB/s 34.1GB/s
Max Memory Channels 6 4
Supported Memory Size 384GB 750GB
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support Yes Yes
Bus Bandwidth Not Known 6.4GT/s
Benchmarks Benchmarks Intel Xeon Phi 7290 Intel Xeon E5-2603
PassMark Score Not Known 3510
PassMark Score (Single Thread) Not Known 960

Similar Comparisons