Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 vs AMD Z-01

VS
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 Image
AMD Z-01
AMD Z-01 Image
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
AMD Z-01
Key Differences Key Differences Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 AMD Z-01
Cores 56 2
CPU Threads 112 2
Base Clock Speed 2.6GHz 1GHz
Turbo Clock Speed 3.8GHz Not Known
TDP (THERMAL DESIGN POINT) 400W 5.9W
Has integrated graphics No Yes
Performance per watt Not Known 178.0
Performance Performance Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 AMD Z-01
CPU Speed & Cores 56 x 2.6GHz 2 x 1GHz
Number of CPU Threads 112 2
Turbo Boost Frequency 3.8GHz Not Known
Does it have an unlocked multiplier No No
Turbo Boost Tech Version 2 Not Known
L2 Cache Size Not Known 1MB
L1 Cache Size Not Known 128KB
L2 Core Not Known 0.5MB/core
Uses ARM big.LITTLE tech No No
Uses ARM HMP No No
Clock Multiplier Not Known 5
Features Features Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 AMD Z-01
Supports CPU Throttling Yes Yes
Supported SSE Version 4.2 4
Has AVX Support Yes No
Has MMX Tech Support Yes Yes
Has F16C Support Yes No
Has FMA4 Instructions Support No No
Has Multithreading Tech Support Yes No
Has FMA3 Instructions Support Yes No
Has AES Support No No
Supports ARM TrustZone Tech No No
Has NX Processor Bit Support No Yes
General info General info Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 AMD Z-01
Has 64-bit Support No Data Found No Data Found
Semiconductor Size 14nm 40nm
TDP (Thermal Design Point) 400W 5.9W
Does it have Integrated Graphics No Yes
GPU Base Clock Speed Not Known 276MHz
PCI Express Version 3 1
DirectX Version Info Not Known 11
OpenGL Driver Version Not Known 4.1
OpenGL Driver Version Not Known 1.2
No. of Supported Displays Not Known 3
Supports Power Optimized L2 Cache No No
Memory Memory Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 AMD Z-01
RAM Memory Speed 2933MHz 1066MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 262.26GB/s Not Known
Max Memory Channels 12 Not Known
Supported Memory Size 2000GB Not Known
DDR Type Memory Version 4 Not Known
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support No No
Benchmarks Benchmarks Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 AMD Z-01
PassMark Score Not Known 487
CPU Performance (Per Watt) Not Known 178.0

Similar Comparisons