KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC vs AMD Radeon 530

VS
KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC
KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC Image
AMD Radeon 530
AMD Radeon 530 Image
KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC
AMD Radeon 530
Key Differences Key Differences KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC AMD Radeon 530
GPU Base Clock Speed 1395MHz 730MHz
GPU Boost Clock Speed 1695MHz 1024MHz
Pixel Rate 189.8 GPixel/s 8.2 GPixel/s
GPU Memory Speed 1219MHz 900MHz
GPU Render Output Units (ROPs) 112 8
No. of Supported Displays Not Known Not Known
Performance Performance KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC AMD Radeon 530
GPU Base Clock Speed 1395MHz 730MHz
Pixel Rate 189.8 GPixel/s 8.2 GPixel/s
FLOPS (Floating-point Performance) 35.58 TFLOPS 0.8 TFLOPS
GPU Memory Speed 1219MHz 900MHz
Texture Filter Rate 556 GTexels/s 24.58 GTexels/s
Total GPU Shading Units 10496 384
Total GPU TMUs 328 24
GPU Boost Clock Speed 1695MHz 1024MHz
GPU Render Output Units (ROPs) 112 8
DPFP (Double Precision Floating Point) Support No No
Features Features KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC AMD Radeon 530
DirectX Version Info 12 12
OpenGL Driver Version 4.6 4.5
OpenCL Driver Version 2 2
Multi-display Tech Support Yes No
3D Support Yes No
Ray Tracing Support Yes No
Ports Ports KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC AMD Radeon 530
HDMI Output Support Yes No
GPU HDMI Version 2.1 Not Known
DisplayPort Output 3 0
No. of HDMI Ports 1 0
DVI Output Ports 0 0
Mini DisplayPort Output 0 0
General info General info KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC AMD Radeon 530
TDP (Thermal Design Point) No Data Found No Data Found
Transistor Count 28000 million 3100 million
Semiconductor Size 8nm 28nm
PCI Express Version 4 3
Dual-GPU Support No No
Air-water Cooling Support No No
Width Size 329mm Not Known
Height 130mm Not Known
Memory Memory KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG 1-Click OC AMD Radeon 530
Effective Memory Clock 9750MHz 4500MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 936GB/s 48GB/s
RAM 24GB 4GB
Memory Bus Interface Width 384bit 64bit
GDDR Memory Version 6 3
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support No No

Similar Comparisons