Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro vs AMD Radeon 530

VS
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro Image
AMD Radeon 530
AMD Radeon 530 Image
Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro
AMD Radeon 530
Key Differences Key Differences Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro AMD Radeon 530
GPU Base Clock Speed 1395MHz 730MHz
GPU Boost Clock Speed 1695MHz 1024MHz
Pixel Rate 189.8 GPixel/s 8.2 GPixel/s
GPU Memory Speed 1219MHz 900MHz
GPU Render Output Units (ROPs) 112 8
No. of Supported Displays 4 Not Known
Performance Performance Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro AMD Radeon 530
GPU Base Clock Speed 1395MHz 730MHz
Pixel Rate 189.8 GPixel/s 8.2 GPixel/s
FLOPS (Floating-point Performance) 35.58 TFLOPS 0.8 TFLOPS
GPU Memory Speed 1219MHz 900MHz
Texture Filter Rate 556 GTexels/s 24.58 GTexels/s
Total GPU Shading Units 10496 384
Total GPU TMUs 328 24
GPU Boost Clock Speed 1695MHz 1024MHz
GPU Render Output Units (ROPs) 112 8
DPFP (Double Precision Floating Point) Support No No
Features Features Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro AMD Radeon 530
DirectX Version Info 12 12
OpenGL Driver Version 4.6 4.5
OpenCL Driver Version 2 2
Multi-display Tech Support Yes No
3D Support Yes No
No. of Supported Displays 4 Not Known
Ray Tracing Support Yes No
Ports Ports Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro AMD Radeon 530
HDMI Output Support Yes No
GPU HDMI Version 2.1 Not Known
DisplayPort Output 3 0
No. of HDMI Ports 1 0
DVI Output Ports 0 0
Mini DisplayPort Output 0 0
General info General info Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro AMD Radeon 530
TDP (Thermal Design Point) No Data Found No Data Found
Transistor Count 28000 million 3100 million
Semiconductor Size 8nm 28nm
PCI Express Version 4 3
Dual-GPU Support No No
Air-water Cooling Support No No
Width Size 294mm Not Known
Height 112mm Not Known
Memory Memory Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GamingPro AMD Radeon 530
Effective Memory Clock 9750MHz 4500MHz
Max Memory Bandwidth 936GB/s 48GB/s
RAM 24GB 4GB
Memory Bus Interface Width 384bit 64bit
GDDR Memory Version 6 3
ECC (Error-Correcting Code) Memory Support No No

Similar Comparisons